|
Re: [aString drawAtPoint:withAttributes:] Works in High Sierra, does not in Mojave - Why?
Try removing the lockfocus/unlockficus - I had to remove them from all my custom widgets to get them to work in 10.14.
Regards
Sak
Try removing the lockfocus/unlockficus - I had to remove them from all my custom widgets to get them to work in 10.14.
Regards
Sak
|
By
Sak Wathanasin
·
#1064
·
|
|
Re: [aString drawAtPoint:withAttributes:] Works in High Sierra, does not in Mojave - Why?
There are a lot of things that need to be done to do drawing right, and any drawing should be done from within a view’s drawRect: method or eventually called by it. Once a view’s drawRect: method
There are a lot of things that need to be done to do drawing right, and any drawing should be done from within a view’s drawRect: method or eventually called by it. Once a view’s drawRect: method
|
By
Gary L. Wade
·
#1063
·
|
|
[aString drawAtPoint:withAttributes:] Works in High Sierra, does not in Mojave - Why?
I have written a small Cocoa program that works in High Sierra but stopped working in Mojave. The program loads a graphics file from disk and displays it full screen. At the bottom it should write the
I have written a small Cocoa program that works in High Sierra but stopped working in Mojave. The program loads a graphics file from disk and displays it full screen. At the bottom it should write the
|
By
Markus Ruggiero
·
#1062
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
The Notarization process is recursive, in that it works its way down the application structure and checks each part as it goes. If you have applications embedded in your app it will check those, and
The Notarization process is recursive, in that it works its way down the application structure and checks each part as it goes. If you have applications embedded in your app it will check those, and
|
By
Jack Brindle
·
#1061
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
I misspoke - I’m not using Sparkle. I’m using Devmate - I thought that used Sparkle internally, but I’m not sure.
Anyway my other app that uses Devmate notarizes with no issues.
I cannot see any
I misspoke - I’m not using Sparkle. I’m using Devmate - I thought that used Sparkle internally, but I’m not sure.
Anyway my other app that uses Devmate notarizes with no issues.
I cannot see any
|
By
Graham Cox
·
#1060
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
Yes ,this is what it says, which is what I said in my original message here
2019-11-01 03:54:51 +0000 Distribution items ineligible: Error Domain=IDEDistributionMethodDeveloperIDErrorDomain Code=1
Yes ,this is what it says, which is what I said in my original message here
2019-11-01 03:54:51 +0000 Distribution items ineligible: Error Domain=IDEDistributionMethodDeveloperIDErrorDomain Code=1
|
By
Graham Cox
·
#1059
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
Have you checked the Notarization report? That will tell you exactly why it failed.
Jack
Have you checked the Notarization report? That will tell you exactly why it failed.
Jack
|
By
Jack Brindle
·
#1058
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
Yes, have you turned on hardened runtime for the AutoUpdate app?
Are you building Sparkle from source within the app project, or building it as a separate framework? What's different between the two
Yes, have you turned on hardened runtime for the AutoUpdate app?
Are you building Sparkle from source within the app project, or building it as a separate framework? What's different between the two
|
By
Jon Gotow
·
#1057
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
Yes, I have Sparkle and some 3rd party frameworks. I’ve checked the box that permits these to be loaded even though they’re signed by another developer.
I have another app with much the same
Yes, I have Sparkle and some 3rd party frameworks. I’ve checked the box that permits these to be loaded even though they’re signed by another developer.
I have another app with much the same
|
By
Graham Cox
·
#1056
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
Have you got any helper applications (including those embedded in Sparkle or other frameworks)? Chances are it's actually complaining about one of those.
- Jon
Have you got any helper applications (including those embedded in Sparkle or other frameworks)? Chances are it's actually complaining about one of those.
- Jon
|
By
Jon Gotow
·
#1055
·
|
|
Re: Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
Hardened Runtime is not currently a requirement for Notarization, but it appears that you have to submit the app using the command-line tool for notarization to happen properly. All my attempts at
Hardened Runtime is not currently a requirement for Notarization, but it appears that you have to submit the app using the command-line tool for notarization to happen properly. All my attempts at
|
By
Jack Brindle
·
#1054
·
|
|
Puzzle with Hardened Runtime entitlement
I have an app I’d like to notarize for distribution outside the app store.
To do this, it requires the hardened runtime entitlement.
I have added that in the project settings.
When I try and submit
I have an app I’d like to notarize for distribution outside the app store.
To do this, it requires the hardened runtime entitlement.
I have added that in the project settings.
When I try and submit
|
By
Graham Cox
·
#1053
·
|
|
Re: Developer
Then check the certificates and profiles in the signed package(s).
I use a cery and profile inspector that someone wrote for Spotlight and is on Github.
Then check the certificates and profiles in the signed package(s).
I use a cery and profile inspector that someone wrote for Spotlight and is on Github.
|
By
Alex Zavatone
·
#1052
·
|
|
Re: Developer
Maybe this helps: Code to decode mobileprovisions https://github.com/below/cgjprofile
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Maybe this helps: Code to decode mobileprovisions https://github.com/below/cgjprofile
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
|
By
Alexander von Below
·
#1051
·
|
|
Re: Developer
Alternatively, run this on the command line to strip the security message container and signing from the contained plist:
```
security cms -D -i path-to.mobileprovision
```
I did some research into
Alternatively, run this on the command line to strip the security message container and signing from the contained plist:
```
security cms -D -i path-to.mobileprovision
```
I did some research into
|
By
Bernie Maier
·
#1050
·
|
|
Re: Developer
Find …/Your iOS.app/embedded.mobileprovision, open in some editor and delete the first 62 bytes, so that it starts with:
“<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8”?>”
Save as:
Find …/Your iOS.app/embedded.mobileprovision, open in some editor and delete the first 62 bytes, so that it starts with:
“<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8”?>”
Save as:
|
By
Gerriet M. Denkmann
·
#1049
·
|
|
Re: Developer
In our case, these apps are just for internal development purposes, such as student projects and the like. It's nice to be able to showcase them each semester, but the iPad apps always expire, and
In our case, these apps are just for internal development purposes, such as student projects and the like. It's nice to be able to showcase them each semester, but the iPad apps always expire, and
|
By
Carl Hoefs
·
#1048
·
|
|
Re: Developer
There are some signing options where if you are part of a TestFlight team, your install will last for a certain time. There are other install options where if you have an Enterprise cert installed
There are some signing options where if you are part of a TestFlight team, your install will last for a certain time. There are other install options where if you have an Enterprise cert installed
|
By
Alex Zavatone
·
#1047
·
|
|
Re: Developer
Seems like it’s a custom signed IPA.
Seems like it’s a custom signed IPA.
|
By
Alex Zavatone
·
#1046
·
|
|
Re: Developer
Did you find out anything more about this problem? We're experiencing it too. iPhone app builds expire after 1 year, but last only a week or two on the iPad. My boss just got bitten by this at a
Did you find out anything more about this problem? We're experiencing it too. iPhone app builds expire after 1 year, but last only a week or two on the iPad. My boss just got bitten by this at a
|
By
Carl Hoefs
·
#1045
·
|